Postby jwocky » Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:12 pm
Well, if you read up about licenses, BY-NC-SA is what a work without explicit license falls back to legally. To express it in terms a programmer woudl use, it's the default. Once the creator is contacted, provided, one can find him, the creator can say, he wants to go more open, like GPL, or say, no, he wants to retain the rights, creative commons keeps for him. So, OPFOR77, aside of reaching a new record on the snark meter, you are also wrong about the legal situation with those works in general.
A special case are some of my old works because ... very embarrassing, but I forgot to write copyrights into them and sometimes even my name (hey, I am in good company with that, greetings at this point to Dave Culp) ... so, I asked Israel and gave him the right, if he finds some of my old stuff without explicit license, to make them GPL. I mention it because I got some months ago emails about that. As far as my work for FG is concerned, Israel acts on my behalf, which is, given that I had to confirm it already several times on this forum, a total legally correct agreement.
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!