Postby jwocky » Thu Nov 10, 2016 9:29 pm
Oh I love it how all those liberals are upset and try to spin it. If you would be a touch brighter, you would open a calculator window and add up the votes as the results show them state by state ... but then, this would kill you delusion, Hilary Clinton won anything because without Arizona and Michigan which hadn't officially announce last night still, Trump had not only the majority of the electoral votes but also already roughly 1 million votes more in the popular vote ... so, you can cheat yourself, but try not too cheat too many other people.
About Iraq and Afghanistan ... since Lester dumped the whole liberal liar's handbook ... opposite to Clinton, who voted for both wars, Trump actually spoke out against them in TV shows. He later changed his stance and said, okay, after politics decided to go to war, he will of course stand behind that, but he never voted for those wars nor did he promote them, that was what you sacrosanct leader did ...
About honor ... well, I found it always an iffy subject to discuss with hardcore liberals.First of all, the tactics to count all the victims of sectarian terrorism in Iraq on Bush and then just make up some extra hundred-thousand dead is too near to blatant lying to make the idea of honor in the liberal sense understandable for me. At some point, so claimed liberla media, there had so many people died, that you had to bring in people to Iraq to have still someone living there. There had allegedly more people died from Bush than there lived to begin with.
Of course, the allegedly so inhonorable thing in putting a dangerous dictator out of business is a subject of discussion too. I mean, it takes a real liberal to ignore Saddam's mass graves around Abu Ghaib and in Northern Iraq. According to latest news, I read, they have in the meantime about 50% of the victims from those mass graves identified. Whole village populations, men, women, children, had been gassed in helicopter attacks. But hey, Saddam also started out once as secular socialist, so I can understand why you don't want to discuss his crimes. It's the same with the "falsehood" claim. See, there was no weaponized uranium found, but if you take a very close look at the Iraq landscape, you find a ruin, it is that of the so-called Tamuz, Block-I (block-II I think was later given up as well). Tamuz-I was a breed reactor for weaponizable uranium, the begin of the nuclear chain (the thing, we have now such problems with in Iran). That thing has about the size of a city block and is still (after the Israelis bombed it in the 80s before it could go hot) about four to five floors high ... one has really to be quite ideological blindfolded to overlook a building of that size. And btw, the C-weapons, Saddam's buddy Chemical-Ali used to kill thousands of Kurds, they count as WMDs too. Oh, but we are not supposed to discuss where Iraq got the C-weapons to begin with because another liberal President, Jimmy the Peanut gave it to them.
So, now, here we are again. The Democrats lost an election ... and after they told us for eight years "we won, get over it", after eight years in which conservatives had to do with the laws of the land as crazy as some of Obama's ideas were, but he was the elected President, after eight years in which Conservatives had to apply to the rules of democracy, as painful as it was often, now, after the lost election, liberal mobs roam the streets, liberals troll forums, your BLM bros call already for open violence ... see, to lose is hard, obviously especially for so-called liberals. A glance into the history books shows, you already once got upset about a politicial defeat and started a civil war. I don't know, maybe your violent wing wants to try again? If not, it is time that you people start to think and think hard ... do you want to flush down democracy the toilet? Or can you adhere to the rules of democracy? Are you an inherently dictatorial ideology (Communism is one for example and so is to a degree Socialism) trying to split the country by hate and lies or are you able to go with the Constitution and try re-unite? That ball is in your half now.
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!
(The winner takes it all et.al)
