Moderators previously received a request of moderation over the latter events/comments on this thread.
Escalation of really aggressive remarks had occurred and these have been bilateral. Both sides had made comments that could be seen as insulting and unacceptable. And the behaviour (of both sides in this situation) has come, in my opinion, as rather reactionary.
1. This thread is not closed and further comments will not be prevented.
2. No post by anyone will be deleted using moderating privileges
3. I invite everyone to an introspection on correct treatment of everyone here, being a friend or not.
4. No one is banned or permanently deleted out of this confrontation.
Disclaimers:
1. This post by Warty: http://www.thejabberwocky.net/viewtopic ... =140#p2548 was requested for moderation
2. This request was not initiated by KL-666, but someone else.
3. I invited Warty to reconsider why someone may had felt the need to request moderation.
4. Warty feels that he is the one that is coming over the fire of criticisms. I can see that, and due to recent personal experiences I also deeply relate to that sentiment.
5. As a consequence, Warty is requesting removal from this board.
Things to consider
@Warty
I don't know for sure what is the comment that spiked your post to be considered unacceptable by some. but, I think that:
Warty wrote:If your sensibilities are so easily offended then maybe you should stay away from facts
Warty wrote: then perhaps ATC-types should respect the wishes of FGUK to operate as a long-established ATC-free zone around EGOD. Perhaps a little mutual respect might help here, rather than suggesting that control-freaks get to to decide who owns what
These two statements were bound to hurt sentiments. Firstly, you are telling Simbambin that she is offended by facts, and advise her to stay out of facts. Secondly, you call the ATC participants "ATC-Types" and then suggest that they or we are control freaks.
MIG29pilot wrote:Careful what you say, He might be Prince Philip!
MiG29Pilot, I am somehow not surprised that you would act this disrespectful toward someone here. That is disappointing. (and the fact that it now comes as "expected" behavior, even more dissapointing)
simbambim wrote:If the UK does win, please send someone to negotiate who is not a psychopath.
Simbambin. Regardless of whether you felt offended by Warty before, calling him a psycopath is really questionable behavior.
Warty wrote:Well, when you find yourself up against against psychiatrists as well as the terminally-offended it's probably best to leave.
I understand your motivations. I call your statement a provoking of scalation of conflict nonetheless. I don't know if someone here is a psychiatrists, and I agree that making statements over your mental health is out of place.
IAHM-COL wrote:KL-666 wrote:Sorry Warty, you can not be taken serious. Are you actually older than 6?
Kind regards, Vincent
+1
Once again. Apologies. I acted light-headed. KL-666 comment is clearly offensive. Again, it is a response to previous attacks, and it contributes to escalation of conflict.
So, over-all, I think all sides here are behaving really out of place.