Okay, I have too much free time and no possibility to fly at the moment.
So I'll answer.
1. I answered to a post stating (at least what I understood) the teacher should have understood that the boy is evil by adding another thought direction into this discussion, namely how the teacher should be able to decide whether the boy is bad or the other kids are bullying him.
2. I did (and do) not know on who this metaphor (I guess this is one, as we're not on a educational forum but on a flight forum) is based. That's why I ask
3. So on who is it based?
4. KL and bomber answered with a statement completely unrelated to this so I am quite a bit confused why he wrote it here, ...
5. Bomber your first sentence is completely non-understandable for me (probably a translation error). Pull the other one it's got bells on. Sounds like a kind of word salad to me
6. How to f*** do you know which topics I read? NSA, eh?
7. Why do YOU support Thorsten with your silence? Being silent is not supporting anyone. For me it means more something like "I don't know enough about this topic" or "I don't have the time (and will) to spend my time on writing an answer or reading everything"
8. Actually I don't understand what Thorsten did bad in this thread.... (probably because I only skimmed it through after you linked it....)
9. Why should I speak up against something I'm not interested in? And anyhow I wouldn't even know about what to speak up?! I've looked at an interesting thread about color temperature which seems to end up with on one side someone coded a filter to do this and on the other hand others suggested to do it hardware-wise (because the blue color comes from the monitor, IIUC)
10. Who/what the hell are perpertrators??
11. The metaphor about the jews is completly tasteless.
12. is a number
13. brings bad luck
14. is 2*7. 5.5 is bad. 2*1.5 3 we're Illuminaty.