Thorsten Postures on GPL

[IAHM-COL]

The point is however, that Thorsten reasoned the existence of FGADDON back then as something with a different policy than FGMEMBERS has in this aspect. Now, he admitted finally, by his actions and arguments, it doesn't. Which makes his whole reasoning for the very existence of FGADDON obsolete.

+1

[bomber]

What Thorsten is saying now is the stand I've always had towards GPL or any licence for that matter....

Not mine. Thorsten understanding of GPL is in my opinion still muddy and incorrect.

I don't know what his UNDERSTANDING is.... to me his mind and logic is a mystery

What I'm refering to is the acceptance that once GPL licence has been attached to a piece of work and distributed then there's no means within GPL to add additonal caveats such as 'asking permission' or 'limitations of publication'..

This has always been the case... however... people have implied that within FG there's some sort of 'gentlemans agreement' and a hell of a lot of the sheep both there and here have agreed with it.... Well folks more fool YOU, as Thorsten and Curt et al are no men of honour.

Simon

[bomber]

"Can you say to the big one, that I have nothing to do with his wrong analysis and arguments, I'm close to 85 years old I have passed the age of his kids.
The dialogue is broken for a long time at least with me and probably the next coming Josh"

Well my respects.... there's still some life in this 'old dog' it would seem.

Shame the sheep are so sheepish, but what will it take for them to wake up ?
When will they see the common denominator ?.... that it's not just Israel, jwocky, bomber, shm.... the list just gets longer that can see the truth.

bahhhhh bahhhhh bahhhhh