You quoted at least three times "dark-haired and dark eyes" ripped out of context.
You accused me, based on your selectively quoting of "racial profiling"
You reconstructed your quint essence of this discussion in your ABCs (quoted and detailed why your presentation is an open lie in the last post)
Of course we won't forget your use of the convenient political correct lie you used for your serial killer example in the Midwest
But then again, I don't have white skin, and my hair is black. It's easy enough for people who aren't going to be profiled because of their skin color to favor this line of action.
by Lydiot » Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:57 am
Now, if that isn't an intentional lie, do you really believe, that is what people do? And you had even to take out the focus of Brussels and Islamic Terrorism to follow up on your racist obsession.
How about the US? By far the majority of actual terrorist activity is not due to religion. And this has been true for a long time. I don't see much profiling of white people here either, to ensure the right-wing nutcases don't go blowing up federal buildings, burn abortion clinics or murder black people.
from the same post ...
Well, I can't be sure you don't see it because your ideological and racist obsessions put a filter in your brain, but of the terror attacks in the last decade, 50% had an Islamist background, about 30% was black on white racism only about 15% actually white on other ethnicities. Nevertheless, because it's such a political hotbed, of the resources to profile terror suspects and unsubs prone to commit such acts about 40% go in profiling white militias and such stuff (it was 25% before Obama). But you didn't know that, you blew your "racist fantasy" out as a fact.
Profiling using race IS racial profiling, duh. It's, you know, the definition of it.
by Lydiot » Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:11 pm
To get to this line, you had first to rip out almost all the rest of my post, the epitome of selective reading and quoting. And pof course, it's an open accusation of "racial profiling" which, if you would be right, would be racist. So your little rhetorical trap setting aside here, which was already as dirty as it gets, You reduced profiling, a job that deals often with hundred of attributes of an unsub intentionally just to hair and eye color ... just to make your poit. So how much construction is that from you?
Further more, do you see that you're actually avoiding the point I'm making? Do you see that you effectively managed to completely avoid answering my question, which wasn't as rhetorical as it sounded? I asked you if it would be reasonable to use white skin, blonde hair and blue eyes as PART OF profiling in Norway. Would that be reasonable to you?
/quote]
I answered this question before, in other posts about profiling and at least already three times after you post. Every visual attribute is in my opinion valid and reasonable. Having said that, since you left intentionally out the main point of my original post to accuse me of racial profiling, bubble neighborhoods, and had to construct intentionally a kind of global neighborhood, just to go to Norway to get a blond guy (which once again shows through what length you went for your race obsession), you cut, just to make your racist point, an essential part out of what I said. With the obvious intent to twist the original post.
Anyone can dye their hair blonde and wear contacts. What about that is difficult for you to admit? Either you're so gullible as to think would-be terrorists wouldn't avoid detection using those means, or it was really just a euphemism
by Lydiot » Thu Mar 31, 2016 11:50 pm
So, you say something utterly stupid because you have no idea about this business ... and then you it to call me gullible ... but of course, it was not about that, it was just one of your underhanded strikes ... logical fallacy as you call thinking about victims, right?
"Hair" isn't a "group" or an "environment", that's what you appear to not comprehend. If you're going to go after Neonazis then what sets them apart from others isn't their hair color but their beliefs
same post
Hair is a thing that grows on heads - or not. As such it is part of a visual description of an unsub. But you try to put it in a racist context all the time because of your own paranoia. I am not sure whether you are just not able to understand that visual descriptions are important if your try to find people or if your obsession goes so far to deny any access on anybody who looks maybe, in your racist opinion like your race - regardless what he did or is about to do.
Which, up to the "I can't comprehend it" part was maybe just lack of knowledge. But then you construct the neonazis in ... which are usually Caucasian and Caucasians can come in a variety of hair colours. Thus you intentionally had to create an example where hair colour wouldn't work, just to make your point. And that we are clear here, aside of the logical failure of your conclusion because it doesn't work for one specific case tpye, it doesn't work in all cases, the intentional constructing was as good as blatant lying.
Well, those examples are only from the beginning of this mess and I am too busy to search them all out. You tell me about profiling ... or how that term is used in the US ... especially in connection with your TV show taught half-knowledge and I puke.
Again, you're barely making sense. Perhaps it's a language problem. "Profiling", the way the term is used in the US, has to do with having a profile and using it BEFORE taking action - in order to reduce a population to a smaller group, a subset.
by Lydiot » Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:04 am
I rarely heard anybody get so much wrong in so few words. Actually profiling happens during cases as a process as new information becomes available. And profiling doesn't "reduce population", that would be really bad. Actually profiling creates and narrows down suspect pools. Only because your favourite TV show did that once, it doesn't mean, it is so in reality. You can't come up with a whole population as original suspect group. Profiling begins when you have the first parameters. And of course, in any homicide case, a lot of action is already taken before the first profiler is even called to the case. Evidence recovery, canvassing, ... if the case is big, the first part of a taks force structure is set up ... well, I suggest, you read a little bit about it. Of course, you have to overcome your paranoia first.
