rethinking aerodynamics, or the unattached vortices
rethinking aerodynamics, or the unattached vortices
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc
R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?
R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?
Re: rethinking aerodynamics, or the unattached vortices
The fun part about academic science is, we know only one thing for sure:
The certainty of today is the error of tomorrow.
So, scientists found out a lot of things, they do so every day. But every time, someone claiming to be a scientist (with or without title) starts a sentence with "I believe", we know, something stupid is about to happen. As scientist he is of course quite unqualified to believe and on the other side, people tend to believe him because he is a scientist and are themselves of course not enough scientists to understand that said scientist is doing something very unscientific there.
And lines like "I believe, I deserve a drink now" are of course out of competition!
The certainty of today is the error of tomorrow.
So, scientists found out a lot of things, they do so every day. But every time, someone claiming to be a scientist (with or without title) starts a sentence with "I believe", we know, something stupid is about to happen. As scientist he is of course quite unqualified to believe and on the other side, people tend to believe him because he is a scientist and are themselves of course not enough scientists to understand that said scientist is doing something very unscientific there.
And lines like "I believe, I deserve a drink now" are of course out of competition!
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests