Free Flight, Free Speech

Bomber, Please read my post, where I specifically state: Jsbsim is a very customizable method and is a blanks slate to the developer. Since you were talking about Yasim (an FG only) I assumed you meant from FlightGear..., therefoer I refer to the method used in FGFS... I never stated it had to be th...

Yasim calculates it's aerodynamics from geometry, and some specified data. In JSB (As I'm sure you know), the way aerodynamics and flight behavior is calculated is up to the developer of the FDE. So, things will be different. Further, Yasim and JSB use very different things, a engine system designed...

Hi bomber, You misinterperate me. I'm definetrly don't think all FG decisions were right, and there are quite a few things I hate about FG. First, JSBsim is much superior to Yasim, O agree. I don't really care too much if it was lost from my development point of view, since I only use JSB. It doea b...

Now I am convinced you are a Python salesman.

Canvas is actually pretty easy. I don't know why you are so pissed off about Nasal, but hey. What I do know, I'm just an aircraft developed who did everything wrong when programming my aircraft

Kind Regards,
Josh

@Israel, Sorry that I spent over a year to make what is one of the most realistic airliners for FlightGear (was told to me by others, not told by myself), sorry that I spend so much time doing it, I must be doing it all the wrong way. If you think of getting rid of Canvas because it isn't important,...

bomber wrote:But I do find you insincere.

How so? Why would I write things if I did not believe them? I am giving my 100% honest opinion here, and I don't see how me having a different opinion makes me insincere?

Kind Regards,
Josh

Hi Israel, This is also a bit of tiny worhtless code rather than more advanced code, it could easily be compressed down into one line which loads the liverys based on the which -set is loading, but again, back when I added that, I didn't know any better, and couldn't be arsed to rewrite it later dow...

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/000/554/picard-facepalm.jpg Hi Bomber, I know you hate me and all, but I really don't know why you expect me to listen to you when you make such silly immature comments such as: Josh,.............Thorsten, Curt Et Al have taught you well, you now tal...

Again what I just said: I chose to not used object orientated/classes with my code because I wrote that reversing thrust system ages ago as a dirty temporary replacement when making the Airbus engine system -- but I never needed to replace it, so I didn't bother, and it wouldn't benefit the aircraft...

If I had coded the reverse thrust system in an object oriented way, it would take much less lines, but I choose not to when I wrote that file. Further, I don't see how Python is any better than Nasal in this scenario. In fact, looking over your code, your example won't work. (Used some Googling, and...