Re: Beagle Pup experiment
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 9:58 pm
I fly with a stick.
50 hz seems to make a difference. Yet it would be impractical because most other planes have adverse effects when not on 120 hz. Why not just use that freq?
I do not see how the stick has to do with inertia. If you roll, then you have a certain rolling speed. If you put the stick neutral, the rolling speed does not suddenly stop. In fact you may have to put in a slight counter roll to stop the movement fast.
Take off with flaps is in most planes a choice. Shorter run.
First goal of flaps is lift. Every other (sometimes desired) side effects are secondary. The behaviour of flap 3 is really abnormal. It is as if the plane is hung on a string. Most important: Trim authority can not make it descend with neutral controls at near stall speed. That is definitely very wrong. Did you ever fly small planes?
Into a spin with rudder, holding it for a while to not recover too early. Then just release the controls, and the plane recovers nicely by itself.
Kind regards, Vincent
50 hz seems to make a difference. Yet it would be impractical because most other planes have adverse effects when not on 120 hz. Why not just use that freq?
I do not see how the stick has to do with inertia. If you roll, then you have a certain rolling speed. If you put the stick neutral, the rolling speed does not suddenly stop. In fact you may have to put in a slight counter roll to stop the movement fast.
Take off with flaps is in most planes a choice. Shorter run.
First goal of flaps is lift. Every other (sometimes desired) side effects are secondary. The behaviour of flap 3 is really abnormal. It is as if the plane is hung on a string. Most important: Trim authority can not make it descend with neutral controls at near stall speed. That is definitely very wrong. Did you ever fly small planes?
Into a spin with rudder, holding it for a while to not recover too early. Then just release the controls, and the plane recovers nicely by itself.
Kind regards, Vincent