Makes you so sad???
A decision was made between a handful of people rather than the larger community. I criticize that other people didn't get to give input on that. Your reply is I can give input. I predict the input I will give will be "denied", I give input, it gets "denied", and you're "sad"? It was completely predictable. Stop being disingenuous about it. I get the point you kids are trying to put forth, I just don't agree with it. But why would I give any input when you guys could just override it without any consideration, or because you had already made a decision.
Don't like this division in the community? Don't divide it further. Because that's what you're doing.
I frickin' stood up against what I thought was unnecessary banning. I think this path you guys are walking down is beyond ironic.
Have fun with it....
I can see you are frankly strong in your position that Curtis' Forum is the only logical place to host this poll.
I had spent quite lots of today trying to understand you, and the reasoning behind your input, and your fear that the community is being split or that the Event is being stolen. Certainly I can delve it in my mind.
It seems to me you will be unable to compromise on this one. So I am thinking a potential solution to this.
Once we are certain of the total list of candidate positions proposed both in thejabberwocky.net and Curtis' Forum, the poll maybe made on Curtis' Forum instead. No duplication existing in thejabberwocky.net. The poll running for exactly 15 days, allowing all community members (able to), to cast their vote in the Curtis' forum for their preferred next location. At the end of the 15 days, the poll will close in Curtis' forum and the results been frozen will be revealed.
BUTIH-COL, Jabberwocky, and Skyboat, we had not casted our preferences yet. We would be allowed to meet, weight in the situation, and use our three vote counts to add them up into the final Curtis' Forum poll results. We are allowed to associate our three votes, and cast them all of the three, even in the case that our votes where to let's say alter winning positions, or create a tie that forces a re-polling.
would that be a valid alternative? I don't know.
I may be ok with this. I had not consulted either JWocky or Skyboat on their feelings or preferences on this matter.