Re: Responding to Curtis
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 1:30 am
I am loosing context here. Which hostile is BS?
Kind regards, Vincent
Kind regards, Vincent
An independent forum for FlightGear users and developers
https://thejabberwocky-net.brendtandbrendt.com/~brendta1/thejabberwocky/
https://thejabberwocky-net.brendtandbrendt.com/~brendta1/thejabberwocky/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=528
it0uchpods wrote:@Thorsten
Thank you for wasting 2 minutes of mine time.
@all including main devs and FGMEMBERS
Why even is there an argument! Both sides should just stop attacking each other and then the problem is solved. Each side keeps poking each other, and then getting mad at being poked. Nothing will ever change from this! Just everyone go their own ways, so we won't have such stupid arguments.
Think of it like Linux and Windows. The philosophies of the two OS is different, but I do not see Microsoft saying: Linux is a hostile group trying to take away our customers, and vice versera. Same applies here. The main developers just leave each other alone, FGMEMBERS leaves you alone. Let the users decide what they want to use. And since its all GPL, its not like you can change anything now anyways. So all this people making arguments, just stop! Leave each other alone, so we all can use a simulator without fighting.
Do something smart for once. Not stupid.
I'm done.
Thorsten wrote:Edit: I've just been informed via a message that my comment here might be seen as a personal attack - if that is indeed the case, that hasn't been my intention at all and I apologize if it was perceived as such.
Edward states the point of FGMembers would be to replace infrastructure (i.e. he makes an assertion of something). He backs this up by e.g. linking a statement of JW talking about 'slaughter' of FGAddon (i.e. he backs his claim by evidence).
http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=29598&p=285858#p285855