Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Everything in connection with developing aircraft for FlightGear
User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6455
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby IAHM-COL » Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:00 pm

Holy parachuters, JW.
:P

(where is our like button?)
Image
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

User avatar
legoboyvdlp
Posts: 1757
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:49 pm
Location: Venezuela

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby legoboyvdlp » Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:38 pm

It is a 3.4 thing that JWOCKY does not see the white licery. I saw it fine when I met him at PHX.
~~Legoboyvdlp~~
Maiquetia / Venezuela Custom Scenery
Hallo! Ich bin Jonathan.
Hey!
Avatar created by InSapphoWeTrust CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... d=27409879

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6455
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby IAHM-COL » Sat Oct 03, 2015 12:05 am

we don't know yet. I will revise.
I presume it could be a capitals/non capitals thing.
Linux is case sensitive. Windoze is not.

but so far everything is guessing. I'll look for this

IH-COL
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6455
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby IAHM-COL » Sat Oct 03, 2015 12:38 am

@JWocky; @Lego

Yes! I was spot on!
The problem is now fixed for the White Livery. Linux is a case sensitive operating system, and thus White.png and white.png are not the same file ---they could be, but it is not necessary.

Once the case correction was done in the correct xml.line; it is all good under the sun (well.... we are still banned by Curtesy)

IH-COL

Image
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6455
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby IAHM-COL » Sat Oct 03, 2015 12:49 am

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

User avatar
jwocky
Site Admin
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby jwocky » Sat Oct 03, 2015 1:00 am

I was about to post a pic of the white with dragon livery, but you were faster. Thanks a lot IAHM-COL. That's so cool!
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!

User avatar
Martien van der P.
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 6:33 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby Martien van der P. » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:23 pm

I think I've found a solution to make the C-5 solid, I remember a picture made by onox on the other forum, he parked his V-22 on the wing of a 707 flown by MD-GRK. (can't find the picture anymore, I guess it's deleted) The animation they used was enable hot : <enable-hot type="bool">true</enable-hot> and --prop:bool:/sim/multiplay/hot=true (don't know how it works exactly, I'm now searching info maybe we have to contact onox)

Edit:
This is the animation used for scenery objects which are hot but don't want to have it hot:
<animation>
<object-name>Object</object-name>
<enable-hot type="bool">false</enable-hot>
</animation>
So this should also work when you put these lines to C-5.xml like this:
<animation>
<object-name>Object</object-name>
<enable-hot type="bool">true</enable-hot>
</animation>
And I think to let it work over MP you need to add this to the command line:
--prop:bool:/sim/multiplay/hot=true
So probably it should also work at my FG version 2.8.0.5
Last edited by Martien van der P. on Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6455
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby IAHM-COL » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:26 pm

I think MV-DP is correct for 3.6 and above, ONOX (FG3.5) added a parameter that enables multiplayer hotness for aircraft.
some info can be cracked down from the devel.list
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

User avatar
jwocky
Site Admin
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby jwocky » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:50 pm

Okay, so I have to wait till 3.6 is out and I can "officially" change
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6455
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: Maybe I am stupid but ... C-5

Postby IAHM-COL » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:52 pm

only If I'm correct and the "enable multiplayer hot" parameter, was, as I kind of recall, correctly only applied as a patch by ONOX in FG3.5 -- yes.

On the positive side, FG 3.6 is delayed almost 2 months now, which means, its release should occur anytime in the past now

(by the way, I heard I am the one to apologize for this delay :?: :oops: )
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?


Return to “Aircraft Development”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 125 guests