Hi D-ECHO,
As much as i admire your accomplishment, i want to explain to you that we have to deal with more than just getting a plane in fgaddon.
Living in a world where the judges are bent is unsustainable. Agree? Let me show you that there is a huge problem on the other forum in this respect. Then you may also better understand the anger of people that feel mistreated over there.
It0uchpods made a post on that forum about some plane of his, with pictures. Someone asks: What is that airport in the background? And It0uochpods explains that it is XXXX, but only available in terragit. Reasonable info, else the asker might try to see it in terrasync to no avail. Next Bugman deletes the picture, arguing that It0uchpods is advertising fgmembers. No further details given. (And what would be so bad about it if he were?)
Arbitrary moderator decision number 1.
The thread "Out of context quoting to mislead" was developing into inside (fg-forum members) critics towards that arbitrary decision. Believe me, i know, i was following it closely. Even made a praise to Alant about it in:
http://www.thejabberwocky.net/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=700&start=90#p13118. Then Stuart comes in to delete the last 40 posts, claiming that the discussion was treading rules. No further details given. Which rule would that be? Seeing in the wrong moderator decision of deleting It0uchpods image by too many insiders at that forum? So i wrote that down in:
http://www.thejabberwocky.net/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=700&start=90#p13139Arbitrary moderator decision number 2.
My guess is that a normal person like you would say: sorry, i made a mistake, i'll reinstate that picture. But not on that forum. They make it worse by covering up with arbitrary moderator decision number 2.
Can you understand that bent judges wake up some anger in people?
Kind regards, Vincent