OK, i misunderstood you.
This is more than like the reason mine pitches down, and yours pitches up!!!!
Airbus A320 Family Development
Re: Airbus A320 Family Development
It's not you and me, it is the different load in different tanks, but yes, that seems to be the culprit. Did you find anything about where the tanks are supposed to be?
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!
Re: Airbus A320 Family Development
Okay, a bit unplanned, something came in, I have to take care of. I won't be back before tomorrow, I guess. Can you till then figure out where those tanks belong? In doubt, maybe Israel can help, he helped me with such things out several times in the past.
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!
Re: Airbus A320 Family Development
From A320 FCOM:
Don't include the vent tanks.
Roger
Don't include the vent tanks.
Roger
Re: Airbus A320 Family Development
Well okay, I figure something out, but tomorrow or very late tonight ... well, probably tomorrow.
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!
Re: Airbus A320 Family Development
OK I have no school, so I'm available all day.
Re: Airbus A320 Family Development
I am back to business and hit a snag ... well, it's an Airbus, so what did I expect. The real one is so sensible to CG changes, they have to load the cargo holds and passenger compartments to load in a certain order. To make it worse, US passengers are calculated with 220 lbs each, Europeans are calculated with 200 lbs each, which means, an A320-200 can only use the full passenger capacity with Americans on a short flight ... and hell knows how to calculate mixed passenger crowds ...
I got only a chart for the A320-214 though, so, any idea what is the difference to the original -200? I suspect, the basic setup is the same, maybe only here or there a row less, so for now, I just take what I get from the A320-214 and we adapt later? I think about going the extra mile here and defining all 4 cargo holds (which are 1,3,4,5 because #2 is the center tank ... duh) and the three passenger compartments 0A, 0B, 0C for the weight points.
I got only a chart for the A320-214 though, so, any idea what is the difference to the original -200? I suspect, the basic setup is the same, maybe only here or there a row less, so for now, I just take what I get from the A320-214 and we adapt later? I think about going the extra mile here and defining all 4 cargo holds (which are 1,3,4,5 because #2 is the center tank ... duh) and the three passenger compartments 0A, 0B, 0C for the weight points.
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!
Re: Airbus A320 Family Development
It is really just a slight difference in engines.
It's the exact same as a 200.
That should sort out the balance issues.
It's the exact same as a 200.
That should sort out the balance issues.
Last edited by Octal450 on Tue Nov 08, 2016 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Airbus A320 Family Development
I kind of messed up the weight of the cabin crew, but otherwise, it seems to be kind of reasonable. Of course, now I have to do the CGcalculation again in the next step. I push, so you can have a look.
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!
Re: Airbus A320 Family Development
I'm on Mumble
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!
Return to “Aircraft Development”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests