Every vote counts

[LesterBoffo]

Just to illustrate that Jwocky doesn't fact check his own anecdotes..from this website and correctly attributed by Politifact..

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/07/donald-trump/trump-repeats-wrong-claim-he-opposed-iraq-war/

In 2002 Donald Trump indicated he was for the Iraq invasion, “Are you for invading Iraq?” Howard Stern asked him, and Trump answered, “Yeah, I guess so.”

So spin away pap-meister, your assertations have all been debunked. The Iraq intel was cooked, and house and Senate access to it was only for those who agreed to support the decision. It was released under a conditional clause.

Colin Powell said, when alerting Bush to the danger he and his admin were engaging in what was to become the Iraq war, 'once you break it, you are going to own it, and we're going to be responsible for 26 million people standing there looking at us. And it's going to suck up a good 40 to 50 percent of the Army for years. And it's going to take all the oxygen out of the political environment…".' In retrospect..http://www.accuracy.org/release/colin-powells-infamous-u-n-speech-10-years-later-deceiving-public-ignoring-whistleblowers-led-to-war/

[Lydiot]

Is there a "like" button?...

[jwocky]

And that is why I laugh about the Lydiot because he links a known left wing propaganda blah instead of the original Hannity and Cawuto shows. They are on the Internet, look for them. The original shows.
But that is how people like the Lydiot work. One lies first and then the others repeat it till they believe it. Fly home, little drone! Lying about it on a propaganda trick is not the same as debunking it.

[Lydiot]

I didn't link anything - LesterBoffo did!!!
(do we have facepalm emoticons lying around somewhere?)

lol...

And of course you didn't manage to actually refute what Lester said either. The only link I provided was to Trump himself speaking; is that "left wing propaganda" too?

[D-ECHO]

Oh I love it how all those liberals are upset and try to spin it. If you would be a touch brighter, you would open a calculator window and add up the votes as the results show them state by state ... but then, this would kill you delusion, Hilary Clinton won anything because without Arizona and Michigan which hadn't officially announce last night still, Trump had not only the majority of the electoral votes but also already roughly 1 million votes more in the popular vote ... so, you can cheat yourself, but try not too cheat too many other people.

So you mean that Hilary Clinton got less votes than Donald Trump? I'm just asking because then the known left-wing propaganda agency google as always tells the wrong facts: https://www.google.de/search?client=ope ... 8&oe=UTF-8

[IAHM-COL]

Haha @D-eCHO
She clearly got fewer Electoral College Votes than the Elect President Trump.
Google _you linked_ will give you numbers.

If confused: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College

[D-ECHO]

Nope, not talking about electoral college votes but actual votes (the small number below:
clinton: 60.274.974 Stimmen (->Votes)
Trump: 59.937.338 Stimmen (->Votes)

[IAHM-COL]

did you read the wiki I showed you.
The electoral colleges are the ACTUAL votes.
No president in USA is elected with the popular vote. It is the electoral college votes that are computed to declare a President.

[D-ECHO]

With the actual votes I do mean how many people pressed the one or other button or made at one or another place a cross (don't know what it's like to vote in the US)

[IAHM-COL]

so what you mean for actual votes is not what actual votes really are.