Decided to leave.

[bomber]

My guess would be an ultimatum of chose between your friends there or here...

I'm not that easy to bully.

[KL-666]

chose between your friends there or here

That sounds too much like me to my taste. You know Bomber, we made different choices and discussed them, but i have always respected your choice to fight and support you as much as i can.

Luckily you also say:

I'm not that easy to bully.

So i think think you will continue going your own way, and i support you as much as i can.

Kind regards, Vincent

[jwocky]

Well, that you respect and accept other people's choices doesn't necessarily mean, others do, Vincent and if he was pressured from another side, who knows?

[bomber]

Well the fact that he post solely over on FG forum now can only mean 1 of 2 things.

1) He was shown irrefutable proof that Jwocky and IAHM are the illegitimate sons of Satan. Who have manipulated this innocent into being their pawn.
2) He had to make a choice of where his bread was buttered to get the best out of his hobby... ie to be a pariah or not.

[KL-666]

Hi Jwocky,

I know that and therefore i never expect, demand or judge someone for not being reciprocal. Just wanted to make clear my position in this. Nothing more, nothing less.

Kind regards, Vincent

[jwocky]

Errr.... Bomber, why "illegitim"? Buahahaha!

But now, seriously, Lego's motives are Lego's motives. Here, nobody gets pressure about being on both forums unless he doesn't go around and tells kind of politically made up stories about other members. And even then, the pressure wouldn't amount to a ban (usually unless it becomes really cyber bullying).
As you well know, because you got bullied often enough over there, it's another world on Curtis' forum. People there ARE bullied if they don't submit to the "official" political line. Now, no offence, but you are a tough old bird, you can stand the heat. Most of our younger members here are already too mature to be affected a lot by such games. Most others are to straight arrows to bow to such playbooks. But this led us all into some wrongful perception, that everybody here would be immune. There will be always someone who cracks under pressure or thinks, he can get more out by playing the political line over there. At this point and seeing some old mails, I can only assume, Lego is the first or second kind of those cases. But either way, it is nothing anyone here can change.

[bomber]

I totally agree and hold nothing against him..

[123apple]

Clarification: no 'political' motives, purely personal reasons, that I'd rather not share.
Lego

[Octal450]

[SHM]

Why not use the old account then?